NeuFash Ltd Sustainable Fashion Finance Case Study

NeuFash Ltd Sustainable Fashion Finance Case Study

Question 1

“Global sustainable fashion market to hit 33 billion dollars by 2030

The global sustainable fashion market, valued at 7.8 billion dollars in 2023, is on a trajectory of rapid expansion, with projections indicating it will soar to 33.05 billion dollars by 2030”

Coherent Market Insights, April 8, 2024

The above article highlights the potential growth of the sustainable fashion sector, which can further exploit opportunities in sustainability, supply chain resilience and innovation. Theprevalenceof awareness on environmental sustainability also helps boost the growth of this sector.

NeuFashLtd, a listed  textilemanufacturing group, supplies both local and global markets in more than 100 countries with clothing fashion wear for men and women. These fashion wears range from casual to streetwear. The company has three  manufacturing facilities and is considering incorporating  recycled textile manufacturing as part of their transition to sustainable fashion, with the objective to improve profitability. This project requires investment of an estimated $100 million for the production line to be fully operational.

Required:

Critically evaluate on the different sources of funding available to NeuFash Ltd. Your discussion should include;

  • the financial institutions providing the funds,
  • the forms of financial instruments issued for raising funds,
  • the advantages and disadvantages of these instruments, and
  • make recommendations as to how these funds are appropriate to the planned project.                        (30 marks)

Question 2

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of NeuFashLtd, a clothing brand that dedicates itself to sustainable clothing production and recycling, needs to seek further funding for expansion plan, by presenting the company’s financial performance and standing to potential investors. Presented below are the summarized accounts for the company.

NeuFash Income statement for the year ended 31December 2024

 $000
Revenue55,250
Cost of sales(23,500)
Gross Profit31,750
Selling, Distribution and Administrative expenses(12500)
Profit from operations19,250
Finance cost(2,500)
Profit/(Loss) before tax16,750
Tax expense(4,000)
Net profit for the period12,750

NeuFashStatement of Financial Position as at 31December 2024

 $000$000
Assets  
Non-Current Assets  
   Other financial assets6,354 
   Property, plant and equipment99,546 
Total non-current assets 105,900
Current Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents9,120 
   Trade and other receivables2,128 
Inventories19,152 
Total current assets 30,400
Total Assets 136,300
   
Current Liabilities  
   Trade and other payables16,356 
Total current liabilities 16,356
Non-current liabilities  
Long term borrowings40,890 
   Total non-current liabilities 40,890
   Total liabilities 57,246
Equity  
   Share capital51,384 
Retained earnings27,670 
   Total equity 79,054
Total liabilities and equity 136,300

The opening balances of total assets. Liabilities and equities at the beginning of the year are also provided:

Total assets ($000)Total Liabilities ($000)Total Equities ($000)
121,50051,03070,470

a.            In addition to the financial statements presented above, key financial ratios indicating the profitability, efficiency and liquidity of the company for the past year has been compiled, together with their respective industry averages for benchmarking.

Calculate the ratio values forNeuFashLtd the year ended 31 Dec 2024 as follows:

RatiosHistorical DataIndustry Average
 202320242024
Operating Profit Margin (%)36.5 35.2
Return on Total Assets (%)15.8 16.8
Quick/Acid Test ratio0.58 1.05
Times Interest Earned (times)6.8 7.9
Debt ratio0.4 0.48

  (5 marks)

b.            Interpret the following ratios of for NeuFashLtdfor the year ended 31 Dec 2024.                                                                               

  1. Operating Profit Margin
    1. Return on Total Assets
    1. Quick/Acid test ratio
    1. Times interest earned
    1. Debt ratio           

               (15 marks)

c.            Critically evaluate NeuFashLtd’s financial performance over the 2023-2024 period, using the relevant ratios provided and those calculated from part (a). (35 marks)

Question 3

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Fuseman Ltd would like to increase the market share of their company, so as to optimize the investment in the 3D printing additive capability.  One of the strategy is through cost leadership, whereby the successful cost leader competes on the basis of low product price via maintaining low cost. His understanding of cost accounting is limited but is aware there are two approaches to costing for manufacturing firms, absorption costing and marginal costing.

Required:

As the Chief Financial Officer, explain to the CEO the difference between the two costing techniques. You should also critically assess the merits of each costing techniques discussed.   20 marks)

dissertation structure

Want Help Structuring Your Answers!!

✔ Native Singaporean Experts

✔ All Subjects Covered

✔ Professional Guidance

Accounting Homework Help

Accounting Assignment Answers: Experts Answer on NeuFash Case Study

Sources of finance

The sources of finance that can be utilised are equity financing which is useful in attracting investors who value sustainability. Bank loans which allows for direct access to funding at lower interest rates for eco projects. Government grants as an important source to get access to sustainability funds and crowd funding which helps in engaging eco-conscious customers and communities.

Financial ratios

The calculation of financial ratios for NewFash Ltd is performed for the year ended 31st Dec 2024. The important ratios calculated are return on total assets, quick test ratio, times interest earned and debt ratio. The details are included in the appendix section and the analysis of performance indicates that the operating profit margin declined in 2024 compared to previous year from 36.5% to 34.84%. The return on total assets also declined in 2024 whereas the acid test ratio shows a marginal improvement in 2024 compared to previous year. The time interest increases from 6.8 in 2023 to 7.7 times in 2024. The debt ratio also increased marginally. This indicates that the profitability performance of the company has declined in 2024 compared to previous year while its liquidity adequacy has improved in 2024.

Costing methods

The difference between absorption costing and marginal costing is that in absorption costing, all costs are absorbed into the cost of production, whereas in case of marginal costing, only the variable production cost is included in the product cost. The valuation of inventory in absorption costing is done by considering both the fixed and variable production overheads, whereas in marginal costing, the fixed production cost is considered as period cost and written-off in full against profit. The advantages of absorption costing includes better compliance, long term pricing and profit smoothing, whereas for marginal costing, the merits include better decision making ability, clarity and avoid stock manipulation.
In the case of Fuseman Limited cost leadership strategy, it is good to utilise marginal costing for internal decision making, and absorption costing for external reporting. A hybrid approach will help in achieving compliance and also benefit from low cost strategies in 3D printing. 

Want a Full Worked Out Answer with References?

Check Samples of Assignment on Accounting Subject Written by Experts

Related answers